The Benefits and Burdens of Engaging in Argumentation: Trans*feminist Reflections on Tuvel’s “In Defense of Transracialism”

  • Stephanie Julia Kapusta Dalhousie University
Keywords: Rebecca Tuvel, misgendering, argumentation, argumentational injustice, transgender


Après avoir examiné certains moyens d’évaluer l’argumentation, je présente une évaluation éthique de l’argument de Tuvel dans son article « In Defense of Transracialism » (défense du transracialisme). Je soutiens que certaines femmes transgenres qui répliquent à Tuvel sont exposées à certains types d’injustice associés au travail argumentatif, à savoir un fardeau disproportionné et un risque de préjudice psychologique.

Author Biography

Stephanie Julia Kapusta, Dalhousie University

Stephanie Kapusta is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the philosophy department, and Interim Coordinator of the Law, Justice and Society Program in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia. Her principal research interests lie in feminist philosophy, and social and political philosophy, with an emphasis on trans* studies. She has published, among other pieces, articles on misgendering in Hypatia ("Misgendering and its Moral Contestability") and on the indeterminacy of sex predicates in Topoi ("Imposing Sex Predicate Indeterminacy"). She has also written a forthcoming entry in the International Encyclopedia of Ethics (Wiley) on “Transgender Rights,” and a soon-to-appear article in the Australasian Philosophical Review on “The Social Practise of Cognitive Estrangement.” Stephanie gave a recent interview (“Trans*feminism: How Trans Issues and Feminism Overlap”) for the Blog of the American Philosophical Association (APA Blog Interview). She loves trees and fall colours, good Sci-Fi movies, and singing.


Alcoff, Linda. 2006. Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bach, Theodore. 2012. Gender is a natural kind with a historical essence. Ethics 122: 231–272.

Berenstain, Nora. 2016. “Epistemic Exploitation.” Ergo 3(22): 569–590.

Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2017a. “Response to Hypatia controversy over ‘In Defense of Transracialism’.” Learning Trans, May 05 2017. Accessed, April 18, 2018.

Bettcher, Talia Mae. 2017b. “Trans Feminism: Recent Philosophical Developments.” Philosophy Compass 12(11):

Bondy, Patrick. 2010. “Argumentative injustice.” Informal Logic 30(3): 263–278.

Borck, C. Ray 2017. “Negligent Analogies,” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 679–684.

Botts, Tina Fernandes. 2018. “Race and Method: The Tuvel Affair.” Philosophy Today 62(1): 51–62.

Claire, Eli. 2009. Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation, 2nd ed. New York: South End Press.

Dotson, Kristie. 2011. “Tracking epistemic violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing.” Hypatia 26(2): 236–257.

Dotson, Kristie. 2014. “Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology 28(2): 115–138.

Dutta, Ani. 2017. “On Tuvel, Adichie, Dolezal and the Privilege-Identity Distinction.” May 04 2017. Accessed May 11, 2018.

Gheaus, Anca and Lisa Herzog. 2016. “The Goods of Work (Other than Money!)” Journal of Social Philosophy 47(1): 70–89.

Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hookway, Christopher. 2010. “Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Reflections on Fricker.” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 7(2): 151–163.

Kapusta, Stephanie. 2016. “Misgendering and Its Moral Contestability.” Hypatia 31(3): 502–519.

McKinnon, Rachel. 2016. “Epistemic injustice.” Philosophy Compass 11(8): 437–446.

Medina, José. 2011. “The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary.” Social Epistemology 25(1): 15–35.

Micheli, Raphael. 2012. “Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation.” Argumentation 26: 115–126.

Mikkola, Mari. 2009. “Gender concepts and intuitions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39(4): 559–584.

Nordmarken, S. (2014). “Microaggressions.“ TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 1(1–2): 129–134.

Oliver, Kelly. 2017. If this is feminism … The Philosophical Salon, 08 May 2017. Accessed 07 June 2017.

Paglieri, Fabio and Cristiano Castelfranchi. 2010. “Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation.” Argument and Computation 1(1): 71–91.

Peña-Guzmán, David M. and Rebekkah Spera. 2017. “The Philosophical Personality.” Hypatia 32(4): 911–927.

Pulice-Farrow, Lex, Zakary A. Clements and M. Paz Galupo. 2017. “Patterns of Transgender Microaggressions in Friendship: The Role of Gender Identity.” Psychology & Sexuality (8)3: 189—207.

Schuessler, Jennifer. 2017. “A Defense of transracial identity roils philosophy world.” New York Times, 19 May 2017. Accessed 07 June 2017.

Sealey, Kris. 2018. “Transracialism and White Allyship: A Response to Rebecca Tuvel.” Philosophy Today 62(1): 21–29.

Singal, Jesse. 2017. This is what a modern-day witch-hunt looks like. New York Magazine, 02 May 2017. Accessed 07 June 2017.

Stryker, Susan. 2015. “Caitlyn Jenner and Rachel Dolezal: Identification, Embodiment, and Bodily Transformation.” July 13 2015. Accessed 17 April 2018.

Sue, D. W. 2010. Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Tessman, Lisa. 2005. Burdened Virtues: Virtue Ethics for Liberatory Struggles. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tessman, Lisa (ed.). 2007. Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. New York: Springer.

Tuvel, Rebecca. 2017a. “In defence of transracialism.” Hypatia 32 (2): 263–78.

Tuvel, Rebecca. 2017b. “What is It Like to Be a Philosopher?” May 17 2017 Accessed 01 June 2018.

Tuvel, Rebecca. 2018. “Racial Transitions and Controversial Positions: Reply to Taylor, Gordon, Sealey, Hom, and Botts.” Philosophy Today 62(1): 73–88.

Winnubst, Shannon. 2017. “Why Tuvel’s article so troubled its critics.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 06, 2017. Accessed June 07, 2017.

Witt, Charlotte. 2011. The Metaphysics of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zack, Naomi. 2005. Inclusive Feminism: A Third Wave Theory of Women’s Commonality. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

39.2 Special Section