Disciplinary Matters in the Hypatia Controversy

  • Namrata Mitra Iona College
Keywords: Hypatia controversy, Rebecca Tuvel, social justice

Abstract

Le problème qui a surgi lors de la controverse concernant Hypatia est de nature systémique. Je soutiens que les objections à l’essai de Tuvel concernant son exclusion des perspectives issues des opinions marginalisées devraient être reformulées comme un enjeu à l’échelle de toute la discipline. Je montre de quelle manière l’applicabilité et la perspective universelles souvent admises dans les écrits canoniques en philosophie, en particulier sur l’histoire et l’identité personnelles, émergent de contextes et de points de vue précis. Je démontre ce qui est en jeu pour reconnaître la particularité de ces contextes. Je trouve qu’il existe une fausse dichotomie entre les recherches apparemment intéressées sur la « justice sociale » et les investigations désintéressées sur la vérité, dichotomie qui perpétue à mon avis les conditions propres à la discipline qui ont donné lieu à la controverse concernant Hypatia.

Author Biography

Namrata Mitra, Iona College

Namrata Mitra is an Assistant Professor of English at Iona College (United States). She earned a Ph.D. degree in Philosophy and Literature at Purdue University in 2012. Her research interests include feminist philosophy, queer theory, and postcolonial literature. Her research examines representations of sexual violence in South Asian literature, comparative postcolonial theories, and the place of shame in nationalist movements.

References

Bergoffen, Debra. 2003. ‘Towards a Politics of the Vulnerable Body.” Hypatia. 18 (1): 116-134. JSTOR Arts and Sciences.

Brison, Susan J. 2003. Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and Subversion of Identity reprinted in 2006. New York: Routlege.

Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Though and Historical Difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Dennett, Daniel. 1978, 2007.“Where am I?” Delight in Thinking: An Introduction to Philosophy Reader edited by Steven D. Hales and Scott C. Lowe. McGraw-Hill: New York.

Hom, L. Sabrina. 2018. “(Dis)-engaging with Race Theory: Feminist Philosophy’s Debate on ‘Transracialism’ as a Case Study.” Philosophy Today 62 (1): 31-50. ProQuest.

“Liberating the Women of Afghanistan.” 2001. NYTimes, Nov, 24 2001.

https://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/24/opinion/liberating-the-women-of-afghanistan.html

Google Docs. 2017. “Open Letter to Hypatia.” Last modified 2 May 2017.

https://archive.is/lUeR4/

Kant, Immanuel. 1784, 1991. “Idea of Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Kant Political Writings edited by Hans Reiss, 41-53. Translated by H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Locke, John. 1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: In Four Books. The Project Gutenberg. August 23, 2017. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/10615/10615-h/10615-h.htm

Mani, Lata. 1990. “Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India.” In Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History edited by Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid: 88-127. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Mayeri, Serena. 2001. “‘A Common Fate of Discrimination’: Race-Gender Analogies in Legal and Historical Perspective.” The Yale Law Journal 6: 1045-1087. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/issue/issue/volume-110-issue-6-april-2001-9471097

McCarthy, Thomas. 2015. “Donald Rumsfeld Denies He Thought Democracy in Iraq was a Realistic Goal.” The Guardian. 9 June 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/09/donald-rumsfeld-iraq-war-democracy-contradiction

Mendus, Susan. 2001. “Losing the Faith: Feminism and Democracy.” In Democracy: A Reader, edited by Ricardo Blaug and John Schwarzmantel, 324-25. New York: Columbia

University Press.

Midgely, Mary. (1981, 2014) “Trying Out One’s Own Sword.” In The Moral Life: An Introductory Reader in Ethics and Literature reprinted in 2014, 5th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Piper, Adrian. 1991. “Passing for White: Passing for Black.” Accessed April, 15 2018. http://www.adrianpiper.com/docs/Passing.pdf

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993. “Queer and Now.” In Tendencies reprinted in 1994, 1-21. Durham: Duke University Press.

Spivak, Gayatri. (1988, 2010). “Can the Subaltern Speak,” Can the Subaltern Speak: Reflections on the History of an India, 21-78. New York: Columbia University Press.

Storr, Will. 2011. “The Rape of Men: The Darkest Secrets of War.” The Guardian, 16 July 2011.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/jul/17/the-rape-of-men

The White House. 2004. “Rights and Aspiration of the People of Afghanistan.” July 8, 2004. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/afghanistan/20040708.html

Tuvel, Rebecca. 2017. “In Defense of Transracialism.” Hypatia. 32 (2): 263- 278. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/hypa.12327

Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Wineburg, Justine. 2017, “Hypatia Controversy Updates (Updated”). Daily Nous, May 9, 2017.

Winnubust, Shannon. 2017. “Why Tuvel’s Article So Troubled its Critics.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, May, 8 2017.

Published
2018-11-22
Section
39.2 Special Section